Progevita vs SHA Spain in 2026: Program Price, Stay Model, and Conflict Disclosure

Progevita and SHA both sell residential health programs in Spain, but their current public offers use different pricing and stay models. Progevita publishes several program starting prices. SHA prices its Advanced Longevity program per guest, per night, with accommodation excluded.¹²

This is a buying comparison, not a clinical ranking. Neither provider’s website supplies comparative outcome data showing that one program produces better long-term health results.

Conflict disclosure: Progevita has claimed its WLC clinic profile and promotes a 2026 WLC ranking on its own website. WLC therefore does not use its scores, Progevita’s reuse of that ranking, or provider testimonials as evidence in this article. The comparison below is limited to current public program terms and questions a buyer can verify in a written quote.

Review note, August 28, 2026: WLC removed the old winner, editorial scores, treatment counts, hotel inventory claims, ratings, and unsupported price ranges. We replaced them with current provider-published terms and clearly labelled provider claims.

The shortest useful comparison

Decision factor	Progevita, Cofrentes	SHA Spain, L’Albir
Public pricing model	Starting price by named program	€1,200 per guest per night for Advanced Longevity
Public minimum	Depends on program; homepage lists several starting prices	Four nights
Accommodation	Must be confirmed for the chosen quote	Explicitly excluded from the €1,200 program rate
Public program emphasis	Consultation, biomarkers, nutrition, movement, thermal setting, and follow-up	Multi-specialty assessment, diagnostics, therapies, meals, and facilities
Main buying risk	What the starting price actually includes	Final total after accommodation and optional services
Evidence limit	Provider descriptions do not prove healthspan improvement	Provider descriptions do not prove healthspan improvement

The public numbers are not directly comparable. A program starting at €1,470 cannot be ranked against a health-program fee of €1,200 per night until both providers quote the same duration, room occupancy, tests, treatments, transfers, taxes, and follow-up.

Progevita’s current public offer

Progevita’s homepage lists six residential pathways with these starting prices:²

• Inflammaging from €1,470;
• Leadership Path from €1,640;
• Optimization from €1,650;
• Detox/Ayuno Reset from €1,950;
• PRO Longevity from €2,000;
• Women’s Vital Path from €2,100.

The site describes a pre-consultation, an on-site medical consultation, biomarker-informed planning, nutrition, movement, a thermal environment, and follow-up. It also names members of its clinical team.

These points help a buyer understand the format, but a starting price is not a complete invoice. Before comparing Progevita with SHA, request:

1. the exact number of nights;
2. room category and single or double occupancy;
3. every laboratory panel and diagnostic included;
4. the number and profession of consultations;
5. named treatments with quantity and duration;
6. meals, transfers, taxes, and thermal services;
7. follow-up duration and who delivers it;
8. supplements, medication, imaging, or add-ons billed separately.

WLC does not repeat the old claim that Progevita offers a fixed number of treatments. A program menu and an individualized prescription are different things.

SHA’s Advanced Longevity program

SHA publishes a starting rate of €1,200 per guest per night for its Advanced Longevity program in Spain, with a minimum stay of four nights and accommodation excluded.¹

Its seven-night program selector lists a broad set of assessments and services, including health and body-composition checks, cardiovascular and cognitive testing, biomarker panels, specialist consultations, personalized therapies, nutrition, training, meals, facility access, and transfer.¹

That list is more specific than a generic claim of “advanced diagnostics,” but it still requires a dated quote. The buyer should confirm which items apply to the selected duration. A seven-night inclusion list cannot be assumed to apply unchanged to a four-night booking.

SHA also makes claims about cellular regeneration, biological aging, and health optimization. Those are provider claims. The program page does not provide comparative trials showing that the package slows aging or outperforms standard preventive care.

The price comparison that can actually be made

Three separate numbers are needed for each clinic:

Cost layer	What to request
Program fee	Named program, duration, consultations, tests, therapies, meals
Stay cost	Room, occupancy, nights, taxes, resort or facility fees
Post-stay cost	Results review, supplements, medication, repeat tests, remote follow-up

For SHA, the public Advanced Longevity rate supplies the program-fee unit but explicitly excludes accommodation. For Progevita, the homepage supplies starting prices but does not make every inclusion comparable from one program to another.

A fair quote comparison should use the same seven fields:

1. total payable amount;
2. number of nights;
3. single or double occupancy;
4. included diagnostics;
5. included clinical time;
6. included treatment sessions;
7. follow-up after departure.

Without those fields, “three times cheaper” or “better value” is not a supportable conclusion.

Different program architectures

Progevita currently presents several focused pathways at lower published entry prices. This may suit a buyer who has a defined goal and wants a shorter, more bounded program. The final scope still needs to be documented.

SHA presents a higher-cost, multi-specialty Advanced Longevity program with a detailed seven-night menu. This may suit a buyer seeking many assessments and services in one stay, provided they understand which are clinically indicated and which are elective.

Neither architecture is automatically better. More tests can increase cost and incidental findings. Fewer tests can miss a buyer’s specific need if the intake process is weak. The useful question is whether each included item changes a medical or behavioral decision.

Clinical evidence and marketing claims

A provider may accurately state that it performs a test or offers a therapy. That does not prove that the complete package improves healthspan.

For every major claim, ask the clinic to identify:

• the exact intervention;
• the intended population;
• the expected outcome;
• the time to that outcome;
• the supporting study or guideline;
• whether the evidence concerns the individual treatment or the clinic’s whole program;
• adverse events and reasons a person should not receive it.

Biomarker changes should not be translated into years of life. A proprietary score should not replace a clinically validated diagnosis. A recovery or wellbeing benefit should not be relabelled as disease prevention without outcome evidence.

Questions both clinics should answer

Send the same request to both providers:

1. What is the legal entity and healthcare licence for the location?
2. Who is medically responsible for the program?
3. Which clinicians will personally see me, and for how long?
4. Which tests are standard and which depend on an initial consultation?
5. Which therapies are optional or investigational?
6. What happens if a test finds something requiring hospital care?
7. Which services are not included in the quoted total?
8. What cancellation, interruption, and refund terms apply?
9. What document will I receive at discharge?
10. Who coordinates follow-up with my regular doctor?
11. How are complications recorded after I leave?
12. Can the clinic provide evidence for each longevity claim without relying on testimonials?

If a sales representative cannot separate the medical plan from the accommodation invoice, the quote is not ready to compare.

Who may prefer each model

Consider Progevita if the written quote confirms that a focused program, lower published entry price, and follow-up model match your needs. Because of WLC’s claimed-profile relationship, make that decision from the provider’s itemized documents and your independent clinician’s advice, not from WLC rankings.

Consider SHA if you want a longer, more extensive assessment and therapy schedule and are comfortable obtaining a separate accommodation total. Ask which components are necessary for your goals and which can be removed.

For either clinic, first use the evidence checklist for choosing a longevity clinic. It focuses on licensing, responsible clinicians, evidence, safety, outcomes, and full cost.

Bottom line

Progevita and SHA are not selling the same unit. Progevita advertises named programs starting between €1,470 and €2,100. SHA advertises Advanced Longevity from €1,200 per guest per night, with a four-night minimum and accommodation excluded.¹²

Do not choose from a winner label, treatment count, or headline percentage. Obtain two itemized quotes for the same duration and occupancy, then compare clinical purpose, included tests, responsible staff, safety plan, follow-up, and total payable cost.

Footnotes

1. SHA. Advanced Longevity. Provider program page accessed August 28, 2026. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

2. Progevita. Programs and current starting prices. Provider homepage accessed August 28, 2026. ↩ ↩² ↩³